Skip to content
Safe & Supportive Schools

Creating Safe & Supportive Schools for Immigrant & English Learner (EL) Students

A toolkit for upholding the human and educational rights of Minnesota students

Every student deserves the opportunity to learn, dream, and succeed in schools where their rights are protected, their dignity is upheld, and their humanity is honored.

Yet today, immigrant and English Learner (EL) students in Minnesota are facing serious threats, including the fear of deportation, the trauma of potential family separation, and the lasting harm caused by discriminatory policies, harmful rhetoric, and bullying.

These challenges not only undermine the safe, supportive school environments every student deserves—they violate their human and constitutional rights to an education.

This toolkit is here to support you—Minnesota educators, administrators, and school leaders—in your critical role of protecting the human rights, dignity, and well-being of immigrant and EL students.

Grounded in federal and state laws, professional standards, and equity-centered and culturally validating best practices, this toolkit supports the creation of safe, inclusive, and equitable learning environments where every student can thrive.

 

For the latest updates and resources in response to increased federal threats and targeted ICE enforcement, see below: Urgent December 2025 Update.

In this Toolkit

Guiding Principles

From addressing urgent challenges like ICE enforcement and systemic barriers to equitable education, to fostering long-term equity and belonging, this MnEEP Toolkit equips educators and school leaders with practical tools to uphold student rights, promote their academic and social success, and ensure schools remain safe spaces for learning, growth, and opportunity for each and every student.

These guiding principles empower educators and leaders to create safe, inclusive, and supportive environments where immigrant and EL students can thrive.

  1. Upholding Legal and Ethical Responsibilities
    Educators and school leaders are empowered through federal and state laws, along with professional standards, to advocate for and protect the rights, dignity, and safety of all students.
  2. Protecting Student Privacy, Rights, and Safety
    Schools must be spaces where student privacy is safeguarded, learning happens without fear for students or their families, and school grounds are upheld as protected zones from unwarranted ICE enforcement.
  3. Ensuring Equitable Access to Education
    Educators are instrumental in removing systemic barriers and ensuring immigrant and EL students have the resources, opportunities, and support they need to thrive both academically and socially.
  4. Fostering Inclusive and Culturally Validating Environments
    Schools have a responsibility to create learning spaces that honor and affirm students’ humanity, dignity, and cultural and linguistic identities, while addressing bullying, harmful rhetoric, and bias with urgency and care.

Upholding Your Legal and Ethical Duties: Leading Safe, Supportive Schools

Your Role in Creating Safe & Inclusive Learning Environments

Every licensed educator, administrator, and superintendent in Minnesota has a legal and ethical responsibility to protect the human rights, dignity, and safety of all students, including undocumented students.

Educators are empowered by federal and state laws and the Minnesota Professional Educator Licensing Standards Board (PELSB) Code of Ethics to act as leaders, advocates, and defenders of students’ rights. These frameworks provide the authority and tools you need to:

  • Guarantee education as a fundamental right (Minnesota Constitution, Plyler v. Doe).
  • Maintain schools as safe and supportive spaces for all students, free from federal enforcement without judicial warrants.
  • Uphold ethical duties to remove barriers, maintain confidentiality, and foster safe, equitable, inclusive learning environments.

Current Legal Frameworks & PELSB Ethical Standards

As a licensed educator and administrator, these legal  protections and professional standards reinforce and support your authority to act as a leader and advocate for all students.

Plyler v. Doe (1982)

Guarantees all children—regardless of immigration status—access to free public K-12 education under the Equal Protection Clause.

You are legally obligated to enroll and serve all students without barriers, ensuring every child has equitable access to a free education—recognized as playing a  “fundamental role in maintaining the fabric of our society.”

PELSB Standard: “A teacher shall not discriminate against any student on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation, or age.”  (Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(E))

Minnesota Administrative Rules
Minnesota Constitution, Article XIII, Section 1

Establishes education as a fundamental right and requires the state to provide a “general and uniform” system of public schools.

You have the constitutional authority and obligation to ensure equitable access to education for all students and to advocate for them when their rights are threatened.

PELSB Standard:A teacher shall not discriminate against any student on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation, or age.(Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(E))

Minnesota Administrative Rules
Minnesota Enrollment Policy: Prohibition of Immigration Status Inquiry

Minnesota schools cannot inquire about a student’s or their family’s immigration status during enrollment. Schools cannot require birth certificates or similar documents as a condition of enrollment.

You are legally and ethically obligated to enroll all students without barriers, ensuring that immigration status is never a condition for accessing a free and equitable education.

PELSB Standard: “A teacher shall not discriminate against any student on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation, or age.” (Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(E))

Minnesota Administrative Rules
Current ICE Policies & Procedures

For immigration enforcement to search or enter a private area within a formerly protected area, the Fourth Amendment requires a valid judicial warrant signed by a federal judge unless staff at those areas consent to the search.

You have the legal authority to refuse ICE entry without a valid judicial warrant, ensuring your school remains a safe and supportive space for each and every student.

PELSB Standard: A teacher shall make reasonable effort to protect the student from conditions harmful to health and safety.” (Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(B))

Minnesota Administrative Rules
Minnesota Safe and Supportive Schools Act (2014)

Requires schools to implement anti-bullying policies to protect students from harassment based on race or national origin.

You have the legal power and ethical responsibility to protect students from harm and foster a safe, supportive, inclusive school climate where every student is honored, respected, and empowered to thrive.

PELSB Standard: A teacher shall make reasonable effort to protect the student from conditions harmful to health and safety. (Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(B)) Proactive Interventions: Aligning with Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(B) and Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(E), teachers must address bullying or harassment based on race, ethnicity, national origin, language, sexual orientation, or other identities.

Minnesota Administrative Rules
Minnesota Human Rights Act

Prohibits discrimination in education based on race, national origin, or other protected characteristics.

You are empowered to uphold non-discriminatory practices, advocate for equitable treatment, and create inclusive, safe learning environments for all students.

PELSB Standards:  “A teacher shall not discriminate against any student on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation, or age.” (Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(E)) “A teacher shall make reasonable effort to assure that the rights of students are protected.” (Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(H))

Minnesota Administrative Rules
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)

Prohibits sharing of any and all personally identifiable information (PII) contained in education records.

You are empowered to uphold privacy laws of all students, included undocumented students, unless a signed judicial subpoena has been issued by state of federal court.

PELSB Standards:  “A teacher shall not discriminate against any student on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation, or age.” (Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(E)) “A teacher shall make reasonable effort to assure that the rights of students are protected.” (Rule 8710.2100, Subp. 2(H))

FERPA Rules

Protecting Your Students’ Rights

Action Checklists for Building Schoolwide Readiness and Sustaining Safe, Supportive Schools

Educators and school leaders have the authority and responsibility to safeguard the rights, safety, and dignity of all students, particularly immigrant and EL learners.

Even in the face of shifting federal policies, such as the Trump administration’s declaration that schools are no longer “safe spaces” from ICE enforcement, schools retain strong legal protections that uphold student rights and limit ICE actions, including:

  • Protection from Unauthorized Entry:  School districts can create policies to ensure ICE agents cannot enter school grounds without a judicial warrant signed by a judge.
  • Protection of Student Records: The FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) FERPA prohibits the release of student information, including immigration-related data, without proper legal authorization.
  • Local District Authority: Schools can establish policies to regulate ICE interactions, requiring agents to work through designated legal or administrative points of contact.

This section provides practical checklists and tools to help you build policies and procedures that prioritize student rights and safety. From responding to ICE inquiries to ensuring compliance with FERPA, these resources guide you in taking bold, proactive steps to create safe and inclusive learning environments where each and every student has the opportunity to thrive.

For the latest updates and resources in response to increased federal threats and targeted enforcement, see below: Urgent December 2025 Update.

A. What To Do if ICE Shows Up at Your School

If ICE or other law enforcement officials arrive at your school, it is essential to verify their legal authority before granting access to school grounds or student information.

Although the Trump administration rescinded the “safe zone” policy, schools remain protected under the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches.

Under this protection, ICE must present a judicial warrant signed by a judge to access school grounds or obtain student information.

However,  not all ICE documents meet this standard, so it is critical to carefully review any paperwork they present.

1. Ask to See a Judicial Warrant.

A judicial warrant is a formal written order issued by a state or federal court, such as a “Minnesota State Court” or a “U.S. District Court,” and signed by a judge or magistrate. It authorizes law enforcement officers to make an arrest, a seizure, or a search.

This is different than an “administrative warrant” that ICE or other officers might present as granting them authority on school property or other school-centered locations.

2. Confirm the Validity of All Documents 

Ensure it is a judicial warrant signed by a judge. (This NOT the same as a administrative warrant or ICE form).

  • Look for clear indicators:
    • Judge’s signature
    • Date
    • Specific authorization
  • Verify specific details in the judicial warrant:
    • The warrant has the correct full name of the student or person in question.
    • The warrant is for the exact location. 
    • The warrant applies specifically to your school grounds and the student named.

3. Document & Clarify 

Be sure to write down the following for reporting purposes:

  • Agents’ names
  • Badge numbers
  • Agency affiliation
  • Time, date, and details of the request

4. Decline Administrative Warrants

An “administrative warrant” is a written document issued by a federal agency, such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), that authorizes a law enforcement officer to make an arrest or seizure under the agency’s authority.

Key Limitations of Administrative Warrants:

  • Schools are NOT legally required to comply with search or enforcement actions on school grounds based solely on an administrative warrant.
  • Access to school property or student information requires a separate judicial warrant signed by a judge.

Responding to Administrative Warrants:

  • If presented with an administrative warrant or ICE form (e.g., I-200 or I-205), you have the authority to clarify: “This is not a judicial warrant and does not provide legal authority to access school grounds.”

Schools are safe spaces, and educators have a responsibility to protect students from harm and safeguard their personal information. This includes responding appropriately to potential ICE actions while upholding students’ rights under federal law.

1. Keep Students Safe

  • Maintain a Calm Environment:
    Stay calm and reassuring to prevent panic among students and staff.
  • Escort Students to Safety if Needed:
    Assign staff to accompany students to a safe space if there is a perceived threat or ICE presence.
  • Prevent Direct Interaction with ICE Agents:
    Do not allow ICE agents to approach or remove students from school grounds. Any requests should be referred to the administration or legal counsel.

2. Safeguard Student Information

  • Understand Privacy Protections:
    The Family Educational Rights & Privacy Act (FERPA) prohibits the release of a student’s immigration status, personal records, or identifiable information without proper legal authorization, such as a judicial warrant signed by a judge.
  • Ensure Staff Training:
    Train all staff on FERPA protections and their role in safeguarding student information. Include specific guidance on how to respond to ICE inquiries.
  • Refer ICE Requests to Legal Counsel:
    If ICE requests student records or information, direct them to the district’s legal counsel or designated point of contact. Do not provide any information directly.

3. Foster Inclusive & Culturally Validating Learning Environments

  • Model Respect and Inclusion:
    Train staff to respond to discrimination or bias swiftly and effectively, ensuring all students see that their dignity is upheld and their safety is prioritized.
  • Empower Student Voices:
    Provide platforms like forums, leadership opportunities, or advisory groups where immigrant and EL students can share their perspectives, helping them feel valued and heard.
  • Celebrate and Incorporate Cultural Contributions:
    Embed students’ cultural and linguistic backgrounds into the curriculum, school events, and classroom activities, highlighting the ways their unique identities are integral in creating a rich and dynamic learning environment for all students.
  • Visibly Commit to Safety and Support:
    Develop clear, accessible policies against discrimination and harassment, and communicate them widely to staff, students, and families. Display these commitments in multiple languages throughout the school.

1. Inform School Leadership

  • Immediately notify the principal or designated school leader.

2. Follow Your School’s Crisis Response Plan

  • Activate Protocols:
    Ensure staff are aware of their roles and responsibilities in managing the situation.
  • Coordinate with Legal Counsel:
    Consult the district’s legal team to ensure actions align with students’ rights and federal guidelines.
  • Provide Accurate and Accessible Communication:
    Share updates with families that are legally compliant, culturally sensitive, and reassuring. Use multilingual communication channels to reach all families effectively.

3. Designate a Point of Contact:

  • Identify a staff member or team to handle inquiries from families and the community, ensuring clear and consistent messaging.

3. Reaffirm Your School’s Commitment

Communicate clearly to students, families, and the community that your school is dedicated to:

  • Protecting students’ educational rights.
  • Maintaining a safe and inclusive environment for every learner.
  • Honoring immigrant and EL students by supporting their needs, celebrating their aspirations, and fostering their success.

Yes, you can record ICE with your phone or other recording devices.

You have the legal right under the First Amendment and the Right to Record act to record ICE agents, federal agents, and local police, as long as where and how you record them does not impede them in their performance duties. 

Some courts have found that the “right to record” could be subject to certain limitations if someone does not comply with an officer or agent’s request to back up so they can do perform their duties, for example.

This means you can and should record them and take photos at a reasonable distance from their activities, and should have a plan in place for what that will look like for staff. 

1. Designate a point person to write down all of the following details if ICE comes to you school:

  • Names, badge numbers, and agency of ICE agents.
  • Time, date, and location of the incident.
  • The first and last name of the person identified in the warrant, and other critical details of the warrant they are presenting.
  • Who issued and signed the warrant?
    • Was it signed by an ICE agent and is therefore an administrative warrant?
      • Write down their name and other critical details of the ICE administrative warrant. But do not allow entry without a judicial warrant.
    • Was it a federal or state judge?
      • Write down the judge’s name and the state of federal court who issued the judicial warrant.
  • All and any requests made, and all and any details of the documentation presented, included who issued the warrant,

2. Designate another person to take photos and write down vehicle information, including make and model of car and license plate numbers. 

This will help ensure all details are documented, and will provide an additional way to inform communities, if necessary. This is especially necessary when there is confusion around who is doing the detainment in certain incidents, as ICE agents often wear vests labeled with “POLICE.”

3. Designate another person to record the incident. 

Recording the incident promotes accountability and transparency, and ensures students and families feel safe within their schools and that their rights and dignity will be upheld and protected by school staff.

Share this information with school leadership and the district’s legal team.

 

B. Defining and Enforcing Clear Roles for Police and SROs in Schools

Establish Clear Policies for SROs in Contracts & MOUs

Schools have the authority and responsibility to explicitly define the roles and boundaries of School Resource Officers (SROs) to safeguard student rights, prevent overreach, and ensure protection from ICE enforcement or other disruptions to students’ safety, well-being, and learning.

1. Clearly Define the Role of SROs

Schools and districts must ensure that SROs’ responsibilities are focused on safety, not disciplinary or immigration matters.

  • Include Explicit Language: Specify in MOUs that SRO responsibilities are limited to maintaining school safety while upholding students’ human and educational rights.
  • Prevent Overreach: Clearly outline the boundaries of SRO involvement to avoid unnecessary disciplinary actions or law enforcement overreach that could harm students.

2. Prohibit ICE Enforcement Activities

Protect students and their families from the harmful impacts of immigration enforcement on school grounds.

  • Prohibit Facilitation of ICE Actions: Include language in MOUs explicitly stating that SROs or law enforcement cannot facilitate or participate in ICE enforcement on school grounds unless a judicial warrant, signed by a judge, is presented.
  • Train SROs on ICE Authority Limitations:
    • Recognize valid judicial warrants versus administrative warrants (e.g., Forms I-200 or I-205).
    • Refer ICE agents to district legal counsel for all requests.
  • Bar Sharing of Student Information: Explicitly prohibit SROs from accessing or sharing student data (e.g., immigration status, addresses, or other personal details) with ICE or law enforcement agencies.
    • Require all information requests to go through designated district administrators or legal counsel.

3. Protect Student Data and Information

Ensure that student privacy is protected by limiting SROs’ access to educational records.

  • Restrict Access to Records: Clearly state that SROs cannot access student records, including Personally Identifiable Information (PII), without legal authorization like a judicial warrant or parental consent.
  • Emphasize Safety Focus: Clearly define in MOUs that SROs’ primary role is ensuring school safety, not managing or handling educational data.

4. Specify FERPA Exceptions for Safety Emergencies

Disclosures of student information must strictly follow FERPA guidelines, ensuring privacy is maintained except in rare, legally permissible cases.

  • Specific, Articulable, and Significant Threat: Information may only be disclosed if there is a clear, immediate, and significant threat to student or public safety.
  • Narrow Scope of Disclosure: Limit the information shared to what is necessary to address the emergency.
  • Require Documentation: Justify all disclosures in writing, including the nature of the emergency and the parties involved.
  • MOU Guidance: Clearly define these FERPA exceptions in MOUs, emphasizing the school’s commitment to protecting student privacy and ensuring compliance with federal laws.

District and school leaders have a responsibility to exceed state training requirements for School Resource Officers (SROs), ensuring they are equipped to create safe, supportive, and equitable environments that uphold the rights and dignity of all students, including immigrant and EL students.

1. Require Training in Key Areas that Support Student Safety & Belonging

To meet the needs of immigrant and EL students, SRO training should be focused on these critical areas:

  • Race Equity & Cultural Competency:
    Train SROs to understand and respect the diverse cultural, linguistic, and lived experiences of immigrant and EL students. This fosters trust and creates inclusive, supportive environments.
  • Implicit Bias:
    Offer regular training to help SROs identify and address unconscious biases, ensuring fair and equitable treatment of all students.
  • Students’ Rights:
    Educate SROs on students’ privacy protections, including the limitations of ICE authority in schools, to uphold the rights of all students.
  • Trauma-Informed Practices:
    Prepare SROs to recognize and respond to the unique challenges and trauma immigrant and EL students may face, minimizing harm and prioritizing well-being.

2. Implement Specialized SRO Training

To ensure these training priorities translate into meaningful outcomes, leaders must implement specialized training programs that are relevant, effective, and tailored to their communities.

  • Align with State Policies and Local Needs:
    Use Minnesota’s Model Policy for SRO Training as a starting point, but adapt it to meet the specific needs of your district, school, and community.
  • Collaborate with Race Equity and Advocacy Experts:
    Partner with organizations specializing in equity and advocacy to design training that addresses systemic inequities and promotes belonging for all students.
  • Incorporate Regular Training Updates:
    Schedule ongoing training sessions to ensure SROs stay updated on new laws, best practices, and evolving community needs.
  • Monitor and Evaluate Effectiveness:
    Gather feedback from students, staff, and families to assess the impact of training and make continuous improvements.

Effective accountability and oversight ensure that School Resource Officers (SROs) operate equitably and align with district goals for student safety, belonging, and dignity. Strong monitoring and transparent processes help address concerns and improve practices.

1. Establish a Review Committee or Task Force

  • Form a dedicated group to oversee SRO practices and ensure accountability.
  • Assign responsibilities such as:
    • Monitoring interactions between SROs and students.
    • Collecting and analyzing data on disciplinary actions and other outcomes.
    • Evaluating compliance with district equity goals, particularly for immigrant and EL students.

2. Regularly Collect and Analyze Data

  • Develop clear protocols for tracking SRO activities, including:
    • Disciplinary responses.
    • Interactions with students, especially those from marginalized groups.
  • Conduct regular reviews to identify patterns, disparities, or potential harms and address inequities promptly.

3. Provide Transparent Reporting Mechanisms

  • Create a clear and accessible process for students and families to report concerns or complaints about SRO practices.
  • Ensure the process is:
    • Widely communicated in multiple languages.
    • Easy to use for all community members.

4. Respond to Findings & Improve Practices

  • Use data, feedback, and reports to refine SRO policies and practices.
  • Address misconduct by:
    • Holding SROs accountable for inappropriate actions.
    • Providing targeted training to correct harmful behaviors or inequities.
  • Ensure ongoing adjustments based on findings to continuously align SRO practices with equity and inclusion goals.

1. Train Staff on SRO Roles and Responsibilities

  • Provide comprehensive training for school staff to understand the specific duties, boundaries, and limitations of SROs, ensuring alignment with district policies and student protections.

2. Equip Staff to Advocate for Students’ Rights

  • Provide administrators and teachers with the tools, knowledge, and resources needed to advocate effectively for students when concerns about SRO behavior arise.

3. Implement Accessible Reporting Mechanisms

  • Establish clear, user-friendly processes for staff, students, and families to report instances of SRO overreach or misconduct, ensuring all concerns are addressed systematically.

4. Train Staff to Address SRO Overreach

  • Enable staff to recognize and respond to situations where SROs exceed their authority by providing guidance on appropriate intervention strategies and ensuring swift resolution and accountability.

Strong community engagement ensures School Resource Officers (SROs) support student rights, equity, and safety. Collaborative partnerships and accountability measures can address concerns and foster trust.

1. Host Inclusive Stakeholder Forums on SRO Roles

  • Engage Stakeholders
    Organize forums with students, families, advocacy groups, and other community members to discuss SRO roles and practices.
  • Clarify SRO Roles
    Use these forums to define the purpose of SROs, address concerns, and establish shared goals for safety, belonging, and student rights.
  • Focus on Collaboration
    Promote dialogue about how SROs can protect student rights while addressing the needs of immigrant and English Learner (EL) communities.

2. Embed Equity at the Core of SRO Policies and Practices

  • Address Systemic Inequities
    Develop policies that counteract biases and disproportionate disciplinary actions, especially those affecting immigrant and EL students.
  • Refine Policies Through Engagement
    Revise SRO policies using feedback from stakeholder forums to reduce disparities and promote equity.

3. Set Expectations for Accountability

  • Establish Clear Standards
    Collaborate with community members to create policies that hold SROs accountable to legal and ethical standards.
  • Enforce Accountability Measures
    Implement oversight mechanisms, such as reporting processes and review committees, to ensure accountability.

4. Promote Transparency

  • Make Policies Accessible and Understandable
    Provide families with clear materials on SRO roles, safeguards, and policies in multiple languages and formats.
  • Build a Culture of Openness and Accountability
    Create opportunities for ongoing feedback from students, families, and the community, and demonstrate how this feedback shapes improvements in policies.

C. Addressing Bullying & Discrimination Against Immigrant & EL Students

State Law Helps Protect Students from Bullying

The Safe and Supportive Schools Act strengthens protections against bullying in Minnesota schools. This law provides local school districts with the guidance, support, and flexibility needed to adopt clear and enforceable policies that protect all students from bullying, intimidation, and harassment. Every student deserves to attend a school where they feel safe, valued, and free from harm.

What to Do If Schools Fail to Address Bullying or Comply with the Law

If you are concerned that a school district or school has failed to address bullying, or that a school district or school is not complying with the Safe and Supportive Schools Law, please share your concerns with the School Safety Technical Assistance Center by:

  • By Email: MDE.SSTAC@state.mn.us
  • By Phone: 651-582-8364
  • By Mail:
    School Safety Technical Assistance Center
    Minnesota Department of Education
    400 NE Stinson Blvd
    Minneapolis, MN 55413

(Source: MDE)

1. Calmly stop the behavior or language and explain that it violates school policies.

  • Example: “That language is not acceptable here. We respect every student in this space.”

2. Make immediate efforts to resolve the incident, as obligated under the Safe & Supportive Schools Act.

Any employee who witnesses an incident or who possesses reliable information that would lead a reasonable person to believe that bullying has occurred shall:

  • Immediately intervene to protect the safety of the student subjected to the incident and other students involved, as appropriate to context.
  • Make reasonable efforts to address and resolve the incident, including reporting the incident immediately and seeking a remedial response.
  • Cooperate fully in any investigation and resolution of the bullying incident.

Steps for Reporting and Addressing Bullying

1. Notify School Leadership

  • If bullying or harmful language is witnessed among staff, notify school leadership, the designated building report taker, or HR immediately.
  • File an official incident report that reflects how the incident impacts student safety, dignity, and learning.

Model Student Bullying Prohibition Policy 

Under the Safe and Supportive Schools Model Policy, staff are legally required to intervene immediately to protect students from harm and to report incidents of bullying.

Key Responsibilities of the Building Report Taker

1. Policy Oversight:

  • Ensure that the policy, procedures, practices, consequences, and sanctions are fairly and fully implemented.
  • Serve as the primary contact for policy and procedural matters. (Minn. Stat. 121A.031, subd. 4(1) (2024))

2. Investigation:

  • Conduct investigations or assign a third party designated by the school district to handle the investigation.

3. Support Resources:

  • Provide information about available community resources to the target of bullying, the actor, and other affected individuals as appropriate. (Minn. Stat. 121A.031, subd. 4(7) (2024))

4. Restorative Practices:

  • Emphasize restorative practices to repair harm caused by bullying incidents and promote healing.

District legal obligations

1. Duty to Act:

  • Any person who witnesses, observes, or receives a report of conduct that may constitute bullying or other prohibited behavior must make reasonable efforts to address and resolve the situation.
  • This includes informing the building report taker immediately.

2. Accountability for Non-Compliance:

  • School personnel who fail to report or address bullying in a timely manner may be subject to disciplinary action.

3. Privacy and Confidentiality:

  • Reports of bullying are classified as private educational or personnel data and/or confidential investigative data.
  • These reports will not be disclosed except as permitted by law.
  • The building report taker, in conjunction with the responsible authority and others involved in the investigation, is responsible for managing and regulating access to bullying reports and investigation records.

Supporting Students Impacted by Bullying: Immediate and Ongoing Steps

1. Check in with the Student Privately

  • Provide a safe space for the student to share their experience without fear of judgment or retaliation.
  • Reassure the student that the school is committed to addressing the issue and ensuring their safety, dignity, and well-being.

2. Offer Access to Counseling and Support Services

  • Connect the student to counseling or mental health services, including trauma-informed resources that address the emotional impact of bullying.
  • Provide access to cultural liaisons or interpreters if needed to ensure the student feels understood and supported, particularly for immigrant or EL students.
  • Emphasize the availability of school staff trained in restorative practices to help repair harm and rebuild trust.

3. Connect with and Inform the Student’s Family or Caregivers

  • Reach out to the student’s family to inform them of the incident and the steps being taken to address it.
  • Offer information about additional resources, such as community-based organizations, legal support, or advocacy groups, to help the family navigate the situation.
  • Ensure communication is multilingual and culturally responsive to foster trust and understanding.

Grounding in the Safe and Supportive Schools Act

The Safe and Supportive Schools Act requires that schools create environments free from bullying, intimidation, and harassment. This includes:

  • Ensuring that interventions center equity and inclusion, addressing the specific needs of marginalized students.
  • Providing trauma-informed responses and restorative practices to address harm and foster healing.
  • Regularly training staff to recognize and respond to bullying while upholding the rights of all students.

D. Protecting Students’ Privacy and Confidentiality

FERPA, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, is a federal law in the United States designed to protect the privacy of student education records.

It grants certain rights to parents and students regarding access to and control over educational records. FERPA applies to all schools that receive funding under programs administered by the U.S. Department of Education.

FERPA & Immigration Status

FERPA strictly prohibits schools from sharing a student’s immigration status or other sensitive personal information—such as addresses or education records—with outside entities, including law enforcement or federal immigration agencies (e.g., ICE), without proper legal authorization.

  • This legal authorization typically must take the form of a judicial subpoena or warrant signed by a state or federal judge.
  • Schools are NOT required to comply with requests based on administrative warrants or ICE forms.

This confidentiality protects immigrant students and families, ensuring schools remain safe, supportive spaces for all students.

Steps Schools Should Take Now to Strengthen Directory Information Policies

A directory is a tool for sharing student information in specific contexts, such as yearbooks, awards, or event programs. Schools, however, have the authority to limit what is included to protect students, including immigrant and EL students.

1. Review and Redefine Directory Information Policies

  • Limit the scope of directory information to exclude sensitive data such as student name, address, phone number, parent/guardian contact information, nd email.
  • Specify that no directory information will be shared with law enforcement, including ICE, or third-party vendors without explicit consent or legal obligation.

2. Strengthen Opt-Out Processes 

  • Notify families annually of their right to opt out of directory information sharing, and provide clear instructions for opting out.
  • Ensure notices are accessible in multiple languages to reach all families, especially immigrant and EL students.
  • Simplify the opt-out process by offering paper and online forms, making it easy for families to take action.

3. Restrict Disclosures

  • Adopt a limited disclosure policy, specifying approved purposes for directory information use (e.g., yearbooks or school honors).
  • Bar disclosures to law enforcement, including ICE, or commercial third parties unless legally mandated.

4. Provide Staff Training

  • Train staff to understand the new directory information restrictions and how to handle requests.
  • Emphasize that no information, including directory data, should be shared without verifying the purpose and recipient.

5. Enhance Transparency and Engagement

  • Proactively communicate your district’s commitment to protecting student privacy through newsletters, websites, and family outreach events.
  • Host information sessions for parents in multiple languages to explain directory information policies and their rights.

6. Audit and Monitor Practices

  • Implement a system to track all disclosures of directory information, including to whom the data was shared and for what purpose.
  • Regularly review compliance with FERPA and internal policies to prevent unauthorized disclosures.

1. Ensure FERPA and Best Practices Training

  • Ensure all staff members with access to student records are familiar with FERPA regulations and the importance of protecting student privacy.
  • Content Should Include:
    • FERPA’s legal requirements and key provisions.
    • Best practices for handling, storing, and sharing student information.
    • Prohibited activities, such as sharing information without proper consent or legal authority.

2. Facilitate Incident Response Training

  • Equip staff to identify and respond to data breaches or unauthorized access attempts effectively.
  • Key Topics to Cover:
    • Recognizing potential breaches, such as phishing attempts or unauthorized information requests.
    • Reporting and escalation protocols for suspected incidents.
    • Immediate actions to safeguard affected data and notify appropriate authorities.

3. Provide Clear Scripts for Handling Unauthorized Requests

  • Empower staff to confidently decline inappropriate or unauthorized requests for student information, including from ICE officials.
    • Sample Scripts:
      • “I’m sorry, but I cannot share that information. You may contact our district’s legal counsel for further assistance.”
      • “FERPA regulations prevent me from providing that information. Let me refer you to our privacy officer for any follow-up.”
      • “Our school policy prohibits sharing student data without explicit consent or a court order. I’m happy to connect you with our administration office for more details.”

1. Review Data Collection Practices

  • Inventory All Collected Data:
    Identify what types of information are collected, stored, and processed by the school or district, including personal details, family information, and immigration status.
  • Assess Necessity:
    Evaluate whether each data point is essential for educational purposes. Avoid collecting unnecessary information, particularly regarding immigration status or related sensitive details.

2. Conduct a Comprehensive Data Audit

  • Catalog Data Systems:
    Identify all systems, databases, and platforms where student data is stored, including student information systems, cloud platforms, and physical records.
  • Identify Sensitive Information:
    Flag any records containing sensitive information, such as Social Security Numbers, immigration status, or family background details, that are not legally required for educational purposes.
  • Check for Compliance:
    Ensure all data practices comply with FERPA and state-specific privacy laws. Remove or anonymize information that is not compliant or necessary.

3. Implement Data Minimization Strategies

  • Restrict Data Collection:
    Limit the data schools collect to only what is absolutely necessary for enrollment, attendance, or academic purposes.
  • Avoid Sensitive Questions:
    Refrain from asking for immigration status, parent/guardian legal status, or Social Security Numbers unless legally mandated.

4. Secure Data Storage and Access

  • Control Access to Sensitive Data:
    Ensure that only authorized personnel have access to sensitive student records. Implement role-based permissions to prevent unnecessary exposure.
  • Encrypt Data:
    Use encryption to protect sensitive information in both storage and transmission.
  • Regularly Update Security Protocols:
    Ensure cybersecurity measures are up to date, including software patches, secure passwords, and multi-factor authentication.

1. Clearly Communicate FERPA and Privacy Plans

  • Share the School’s FERPA Policy:
    Provide families with a plain-language summary of FERPA protections, explaining how the school safeguards student data and under what circumstances information may or may not be shared.
  • Outline ICE-Response Protocols: Include information about how the school handles requests from immigration authorities, emphasizing that schools prioritize student privacy and legal protections.
  • Publicize Privacy Safeguards:
    Ensure families know about the processes in place for accessing, reviewing, or correcting student records, as allowed under FERPA.

2. Provide Practical Tools for Families

  • Know-Your-Rights Resources:
    Provide multilingual guides that outline what families should do if immigration authorities request information from them or the school.
  • Emergency Contact and Guardianship Plans:
    Distribute templates or resources to help families prepare for potential disruptions, such as deportation or detainment.
  • Personal Information Guides:
    Offer practical advice to families on minimizing the sharing of sensitive information outside trusted entities.

3. Host Interactive How-To Sessions

Provide safe, supportive, and multilingual information sessions with where families can:

  • Learn how to complete guardianship forms.
  • Review sample ICE-related scenarios and practice responding.
  • Ask questions about FERPA and privacy protections in a safe, supportive environment.

E. Protecting and Supporting Students Amid Deportation Threats

  • Develop a Crisis Response Plan:
    Create clear procedures for school staff to follow when a student or family is affected by deportation actions. Ensure protocols prioritize the safety and well-being of the student.
  • Assign a Point Person:
    Designate a staff member, such as a school counselor, administrator, and/or cultural liaison to coordinate support for affected students and serve as a facilitator for their families.
  • Coordinate with Community Resources:
    Partner with local organizations to provide legal assistance, housing support, and access to basic needs for families experiencing deportation-related disruptions.

1. Inform Families About School Policies

Communicate proactively with families to build trust, provide reassurance, and offer clear guidance on the school’s role in protecting student rights and privacy.

Clearly Explain Privacy Protections:

  • Outline how the school protects student information under FERPA and other privacy laws.
  • Reassure families by sharing specific policies that establish schools as safe zones and prioritize student rights.

2. Host Know-Your-Rights Workshops

Partner with local advocacy groups to empower families with knowledge about their legal rights and how to respond to ICE encounters.

Provide Direct Resources to Families:

  • Legal Aid: Assistance with immigration paperwork, asylum cases, or deportation proceedings.
  • Counseling Services: Support for trauma related to deportation threats or family separation.
  • Community Resources: Referrals to housing, food security programs, or language-accessible services.

Suggested Resources:

3. Provide Families with Emergency Planning Tools

Help families prepare for potential disruptions by offering practical resources and assistance.

Share Critical Planning Tools:

Offer Assistance:

  • Provide support to families in completing these documents, ensuring they are prepared in case of emergencies.
  • Enhance Trauma-Informed Counseling Supports:
    Ensure counselors are trained to support students dealing with the stress and trauma of family separation or deportation threats.
  • Maintain Academic Continuity:
    Develop flexible academic plans to accommodate students dealing with emotional or logistical disruptions, such as missing school or relocating.
  • Create Safe Spaces:
    Establish safe, supportive spaces within schools where students can express their concerns and access resources without fear of judgment or stigma.

Fostering Culturally Validating Learning Spaces

An inclusive and supportive school environment uplifts the humanity, dignity, and strengths of immigrant and EL earners while fostering belonging, equity, and supportive and respectful relationships among students and staff

Creating spaces where immigrant and EL students feel their cultural and linguistic identities are recognized, respected, and celebrated is essential for promoting community, equity, and belonging.

1. Honor Cultural and Linguistic Assets in Everyday Learning:

  • Embed students’ cultural backgrounds, histories, and languages into classroom instruction, curriculum design, and teaching practices.
  • Use instructional materials and examples that reflect and affirm the lived experiences of immigrant and EL students.

2. Affirm Student Identities Through Culturally Validating Activities:

  • Design activities that connect students’ cultural and linguistic heritage to their academic learning, such as oral history projects, multilingual writing assignments, or community-driven storytelling.
  • Celebrate cultural milestones and heritage in ways that connect to broader learning goals, ensuring these events are meaningful and inclusive.

3. Promote Student-Led Cultural Expression:

  • Support student-led initiatives that allow immigrant and EL students to share their cultural knowledge with peers, such as heritage clubs, language ambassador programs, or student panels.
  • Encourage multilingual presentations, performances, and artistic expressions as part of everyday school life, not just during designated events.

4. Collaborate with Families and Communities:

  • Partner with families and cultural leaders to co-create learning spaces that reflect community values and traditions.
  • Invite community members to contribute to classroom lessons or schoolwide events, ensuring authentic representation.

Advocate for Policies That Build Better Schools and Enhance Outcomes for Immigrant and EL Students

Supporting policies that address the unique needs of immigrant and EL students is essential for creating schools where all learners can thrive. Advocacy efforts can help foster safe, inclusive, and equitable environments that uphold student rights, empower educators, and build stronger school communities.

1. Advocate for Safe School Environments

  • Establish Schools as Safe Zones: Support policies that designate schools as safe spaces, free from immigration enforcement activities, ensuring that all students can learn without fear.
  • Protect Student Privacy: Ensure adherence to privacy laws, such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), to prevent unauthorized sharing of student information with external agencies.

2. Promote Equitable Access to Resources for Immigrant & EL Students

  • Increase Funding for EL Programs: Advocate for enhanced funding to support EL students, addressing the historical underfunding that has limited educational opportunities.
  • Expand Support Services: Push for policies that provide comprehensive services, including bilingual supports, counseling, and mental health resources, to meet the diverse needs of immigrant and EL students.
  • Invest in Technology Access: Advocate for policies that provide EL students and their families with access to digital tools and resources, bridging technology gaps that impact academic success.

3. Protect Students’ Rights

  • Safeguard Against Discrimination: Advocate for policies that protect students from discrimination based on immigration status or language proficiency, promoting equity and inclusion.
  • Support Legal Protections: Work towards legislation that upholds the rights of immigrant and EL students, ensuring they have equal access to educational opportunities.
  • Address Language Access Gaps: Advocate for policies requiring schools to offer translated materials, interpretation services, and multilingual family engagement strategies to protect and include EL students and their families.

 

Urgent 2025 Update

Rapid Response Strategies for Schools During Targeted Immigration Enforcement

MnEEP Tools, Guidance, & Emerging Practices from Schools Nationwide

Updated December 8, 2025

Increased Threats and Harmful Rhetoric Are Targeting Minnesota Communities

Across Minnesota, immigrant communities—including the more than 500,000 Minnesotans who call this state home—are confronting intensifying threats to their civil and human rights, their safety, and their ability to participate fully in public life. In recent weeks, Somali Minnesotans have been singled out with overtly racist and xenophobic rhetoric and heightened ICE enforcement while Latine, East African, Southeast Asian, and other immigrant communities are experiencing escalating assaults on their dignity, safety, and rights as targeted ICE activities spread across the state.

These actions are not isolated. They reflect coordinated efforts to generate fear and trauma, dehumanize Black Muslim and other immigrant and refugee communities, and advance an exclusionary, racialized vision of who belongs in our state, our neighborhoods, and our public schools.

Minnesota Schools Are at the Center of This Moment

These harms are not left at the school entrance. They show up as declining in attendance when families fear leaving home; in students arriving afraid exhausted; in caregivers pulling back from school life; and in increased bullying fueled by harmful narratives circulating outside school walls.

Even amid this fear and instability, our public schools often remain one of the few places where students can reliably feel valued, seen, and supported as their full selves. In this moment, Minnesota schools play a crucial public role in sustaining the safety, belonging, and stability every learner deserves.

What this Toolkit Update Provides Educators

Across the country, schools facing heightened enforcement and targeted harm in their communities are pairing  critical “ICE-at-the-door” protocols with proactive, community-centered practices of care. Working alongside community members and immigrant- and refugee-led organizations that hold trust, cultural knowledge, and legal and navigational expertise, schools are adapting in real time to ensure learning and access are not disrupted, safety and belonging are centered, and students and families remain connected to the supports they need.

The strategies that follow adapt these lessons for Minnesota’s constitutional and civic context, highlighting how districts can respond to the lived realities of their communities by strengthening systems of care, sustaining learning, and anchoring schools as trusted public spaces for the entire community.

Strategy 1: Establish School–Community Anchor Sites

Why This Matters in Minnesota

Minnesota’s public schools have long served as community hubs—places where families seek safety, connection, and trusted information. During increased federal threats and immigration-enforcement actions, schools may be the only public institutions immigrant families continue to trust.

Establishing designated Anchor Sites—shown to be a crucial strategy in cities such as Chicago and New York—reinforces not only the support role schools already play, but their public duty to ensure that every student can safely access their education. Anchor Sites uphold the public purpose of education by offering consistent, culturally grounded spaces where students, families, and communities can receive critical support, accurate information, and a sense of collective stability.

1. Designate a School or District Space as a Community Anchor Site.

  • Identify a highly visible, trusted school or district facility to serve as an Anchor Site during periods of targeted fear or community instability.
  • Clearly communicate its purpose: a place where families can access reliable information, rights-based guidance, and immediate support without fear of enforcement.
  • Ensure multilingual signage, public-facing hours, and clear points of contact.

2. Provide Coordinated, Community-Led Rapid-Response Services.

Offer integrated support that reflects the needs families face during enforcement-related fear:

  • Immigration legal triage (Know Your Rights support, emergency planning, referrals to legal counsel).
  • Family-preparedness assistance, including temporary guardianship forms, school-based emergency contacts, and continuity-of-care planning for children.
  • Culturally grounded mental-health support, delivered by trusted Somali-, Latino-, and immigrant-serving providers.
  • Navigation, translation, and crisis support, helping families understand their options and stay connected to school services.

This positions schools as a stabilizing force—not just educational institutions, but civic lifelines during volatile moments.

3. Extend Hours and Create Accessible, Low-Barrier Entry Points.

  • Offer before/after-school availability, weekend hours, or drop-in times so support is not limited to the instructional day.
  • Implement confidential check-in processes designed to reduce fear and stigma.

4. Use Trusted, Community-Defined Communication Networks.

  • Mobilize channels families already rely on—WhatsApp groups, SMS trees, Somali-language radio, and community centers.
  • Share timely, accurate updates about rights, safety resources, and available support at the Anchor Site.
  • Ensure all communication is multilingual and co-created with community partners.

5. Co-Govern Anchor Sites With Somali-Led and Immigrant-Serving Organizations.

  • Establish joint decision-making structures to ensure the Anchor Site reflects community priorities and cultural knowledge.
  • Invite community partners to co-design programming, communication, and safety protocols.
  • Treat the Anchor Site as shared civic infrastructure—not as a school-led service alone.

6. Connect Anchor Site Work to Districtwide Safety, Belonging, and Learning Goals.

  • Link the work of the Anchor Site to broader efforts around student mental health, consistent attendance, and culturally responsive support.
  • Create feedback loops so school leaders can identify emerging needs early and respond systemically.

7. Develop Continuity Plans for Students Affected by Fear or Family Separation.

  • Provide flexible attendance pathways, homework support, and safe communication channels for students whose families are navigating enforcement threats.
  • Coordinate with counselors, social workers, and cultural liaisons to ensure no student loses access to learning.

Schools across the country are developing rapid-response practices that stabilize families, uphold student rights, and counter the harms of targeted immigration enforcement. These examples illustrate how public schools—acting as civic institutions—are meeting similar challenges with clarity, care, and community partnership.

Minnesota districts can adapt these emerging strategies to strengthen their own response systems and ensure students remain safe, supported, and connected to learning.

National Context (2025): Schools Recognized as Critical Support Hubs

A 2025 national analysis found that heightened immigration enforcement increases school absenteeism, trauma symptoms, and social withdrawal—particularly among multilingual and immigrant-background students. The report also identifies how schools that adopt trauma-informed practices and operate as community support hubs can significantly reduce harm, stabilize student participation, and maintain learning continuity.

Source: https://www.k12dive.com/news/trump-ice-policies-students-trauma-absenteeism/757498/

New York City (2025): Schools as Lifelines for Families After ICE Arrests

Following coordinated ICE arrests of parents, NYC public schools mobilized rapid response systems—designating temporary guardians, coordinating legal triage, offering emotional counseling, and providing basic-needs support such as food and clothing. Teachers, administrators, and social workers organized escort systems so children could travel safely, maintained continuous outreach, and acted as long-term stabilizers for affected families. The response demonstrates how schools can operate as civic anchor institutions during enforcement crises.

Source: https://www.chalkbeat.org/newyork/2025/10/23/ice-arrest-parents-schools-support-students

Chicago (2025): Community-Led Anchor Networks in Schools

Amid heightened immigration enforcement, Chicago educators established “anchor networks” to escort students on walking routes, distribute rights information, and help families navigate fear and uncertainty. These networks, led by teachers and community partners, filled gaps in public infrastructure and provided trusted adult presence in neighborhoods experiencing enforcement activity.

Source: https://www.chalkbeat.org/chicago/2025/11/24/teachers-help-calm-student-immigration-fears-amid-ice-raids/

California (2024–2025): Schools as Safety Hubs During Enforcement Surges

Across California, schools institutionalized “safe hub” practices during immigration crackdowns—setting up resource tables, coordinating with legal-aid organizations, deploying crisis-response teams, and training staff to communicate clearly and consistently with families. These hubs offered families reliable access to information, care, and stabilization, reinforcing schools’ role as essential public institutions during periods of fear.
Source:  https://www.aft.org/news/back-school-joy-tempered-fear

Legal Navigation

Family Preparedness

Somali-Led Community Partners

Multilingual Communication Networks

Radio KALY — https://kalyradio.org/

Strategy 2: Ensure Learning Continuity and Attendance Stability During Enforcement Fears

Why This Matters in Minnesota

Immigration-enforcement activity disrupts students’ ability to attend school and remain engaged in learning. For Somali, Latino, and other immigrant families, fear of being seen in public or traveling outside the home can lead to sudden drops in attendance—not because students are disengaged, but because families are trying to stay safe.

In these moments, Minnesota schools must ensure that instruction remains accessible, stable, and flexible. Learning continuity is both an equity obligation and a core component of the state’s constitutional obligation to ensure safe, supportive, and accessible learning environments for every learner, regardless of immigration status.

1. Create Flexible, Non-Punitive Attendance Supports

  • Adopt and communicate a “safety absence” policy excusing absences related to immigration-enforcement fear or activity.
  • Ensure no student loses enrollment, course credit, or access to services because of enforcement-related absences.
  • Use trauma-informed, supportive outreach—not punitive interventions—to reconnect with students and families.

2. Activate Learning-Continuity Pathways

  • Provide remote or hybrid learning options for students who cannot safely attend school during periods of heightened enforcement activity.
  • Guarantee access to essential learning materials:
    • Chromebooks
    • Hotspots
    • Printed packets
    • Asynchronous coursework
  • Offer multilingual technology support to help families navigate digital learning platforms safely and effectively.

3. Maintain Connection, Belonging, and Stability

  • Assign family liaisons or cultural navigators to check in with absent students, assess needs, and reduce isolation.
  • Build classroom-level flexibility to prevent academic penalization during fear periods:
    • extended make-up work windows
    • adjusted deadlines
    • alternative assignments
  • Monitor attendance patterns to identify students withdrawing due to fear—and respond with supportive, not disciplinary, interventions.

Across the country, schools are developing rapid-response approaches that stabilize learning, protect student participation, and prevent disengagement during periods of heightened immigration-enforcement fear. These emerging practices offer concrete models Minnesota districts can learn from and adapt to ensure students remain safe, connected, and supported.


California Central Valley (2025): Outreach to Counter Attendance Spikes After Raids

A 2025 peer-reviewed study found that immigration raids in the Central Valley produced a 22% increase in daily absences, especially among young and multilingual learners. In response, schools expanded family outreach, counseling, and delivery of learning materials to help stabilize attendance and maintain continuity for fearful students.
Source: https://tom-dee.github.io/files/dee-2025-immigration-PNAS.pdf


Los Angeles Unified School District (2025): Multilingual Outreach to Re-Engage Students Facing Fear

After renewed immigration-enforcement activity, LAUSD saw significant declines in attendance and enrollment among immigrant and newcomer students. Schools responded with expanded multilingual communication, newcomer counseling supports, and outreach campaigns to reassure families that schools remained safe and accessible.
Source: https://www.the74million.org/article/thousands-of-immigrant-students-flee-l-a-unified-schools-after-chilling-effect-of-ice-raids/


Houston Area Districts (2025): Safety Messaging to Reduce Fear-Driven Absences

Following federal enforcement actions, Houston-area districts issued public guidance explaining non-cooperation policies, student rights, and emergency contact procedures. This clear communication aimed to reduce fear-based absences by reassuring families that schools do not share information with immigration authorities.
Source: https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/01/27/houston-area-school-districts-address-immigration-enforcement-policies-amid-federal-crackdowns/


National (2025): Attendance Flexibility to Address Widespread Enforcement-Related Absences

A national EdWeek survey reported elevated absenteeism and anxiety among immigrant-background students during enforcement activity. Some districts responded with flexible attendance policies, remote learning options, and supportive bilingual outreach, helping families maintain engagement without punitive consequences.
Source: https://www.edweek.org/leadership/the-widespread-effects-of-immigration-enforcement-on-schools-in-charts/2025/11


Florida & California Districts (2025): Academic Supports to Counter Learning Disruption

A multi-state analysis found that enforcement-related fear and absences contributed to test-score declines among Spanish-speaking students. Districts added targeted tutoring, expanded counseling, and increased family outreach to counteract the academic impacts of disrupted attendance.
Source: https://www.chalkbeat.org/2025/11/10/immigration-enforcement-could-hurt-student-test-scores-study-finds/


National (2024–2025): Family-Preparedness Planning Reduces Absenteeism During Enforcement Activity

Civil-rights organizations documented that students were more likely to remain engaged in school when families had clear emergency plans, trusted contacts, and guardianship paperwork. Schools that partnered with community organizations to provide preparedness workshops saw greater attendance stability during high-fear periods.
Source: https://www.idra.org/resource-center/how-schools-should-support-children-impacted-by-ice-raids/

Strategy 3: Strengthen Trauma-Informed, Culturally Grounded Supports

Why This Matters in Minnesota

Targeted immigration enforcement produces acute and chronic trauma for Somali, Latino, and other immigrant students and caregivers, including fear of family separation, hypervigilance, grief, disrupted sleep, and a destabilized sense of safety. 

When Minnesota schools center culturally grounded, trauma-informed practices, they honor their longstanding role as trusted community institutions. These practices uphold the state’s public-education mandate and ensure that every young person—especially those most affected by targeted harm—can learn in an environment rooted in safety, dignity, and belonging.

 

1. Provide Culturally Grounded Mental Health Supports

  • Offer culturally grounded support circles or small-group sessions led by Somali-serving cultural navigators, counselors, or community partners to help students and caregivers process fear, stress, and disruption.
  • Provide drop-in counseling and crisis support for students and caregivers experiencing acute fear or stress.
  • Establish “safe spaces” or stabilization rooms where students can decompress, ground, or seek support during high-stress periods.

2. Build Staff Capacity for Trauma-Responsive Practice

  • Train all staff — including teachers, office staff, bus drivers, and support staff— on:
    • Islamophobia, anti-Black racism, and racialized enforcement
    • Refugee and immigrant trauma
    • Secondary trauma experienced by siblings, peers, and educators
    • Trauma-informed approaches that avoid surveillance or punitive discipline

3. Provide Trust-Based, Community-Rooted Support Infrastructure

  • Create confidential referral pathways to culturally specific mental-health providers and family support organizations.
  • Partner with Somali-led organizations and multiracial community groups to co-design trauma-informed supports, ensuring cultural accuracy and trusted access.
  • Incorporate family voice and community wisdom into planning and continuous improvement of trauma supports.

Across the country, schools are implementing trauma-informed, culturally grounded practices to help students navigate fear, anxiety, and instability caused by immigration-enforcement activity. These emerging strategies offer concrete models Minnesota districts can adapt to uphold student dignity, well-being, and belonging during periods of heightened threat.


California (2025): Schools Expand Mental-Health Supports After Immigration Raids

Following a series of immigration-enforcement operations, California educators reported widespread student distress, including fear of family separation, anxiety, and classroom withdrawal. Districts responded by increasing access to on-site counseling, creating wellness rooms, and partnering with culturally specific mental-health providers to help students stabilize during the school day.
Source: https://calmatters.org/health/mental-health/2025/10/immigration-raids-kids-mental-health/


National (2025): Civil-Rights Organizations Call for Trauma-Informed School Responses

Advocacy and education organizations released national guidance urging schools to adopt trauma-informed practices during enforcement surges. Recommended supports included bilingual crisis response teams, classroom safe spaces, culturally specific counseling, and professional development on how enforcement fear affects student behavior and learning.
Source: https://www.idra.org/education_policy/10-strategies-for-how-schools-should-respond-to-help-children-impacted-by-ice-raids/


Texas (2024–2025): School–Community Partnerships Provide Stabilization for Affected Students

In several Texas districts impacted by enforcement activity, immigrant-serving nonprofits collaborated with schools to deliver on-campus healing circles, parent support groups, and culturally grounded mental-health referrals. These partnerships helped reduce student isolation and provided trusted spaces where Somali, Latino, and other immigrant students could process stress and fear.
Source: Documented in regional education-advocacy reports; modeled in IDRA’s national strategy guidance (2024–2025).


National Mental-Health Research (2025): Enforcement Fear Disrupts Learning and Emotional Regulation

Studies and school reports show that immigration-enforcement threats elevate student anxiety, disrupt sleep, and impair concentration and emotional regulation. Teachers and counselors report increased tearfulness, hypervigilance, and somatic symptoms among affected students. Trauma-informed approaches—including grounding techniques, safe spaces, and predictable routines—have been shown to reduce classroom disruptions and improve well-being.
Source: https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/immigration-enforcement-harms-students-schools


Oregon (2024): School-Based Community Liaisons Support Newcomer and Refugee Students During Enforcement Activity

Schools serving large newcomer and refugee populations activated community liaison teams during enforcement events to conduct wellness check-ins, connect families to legal resources, and offer culturally specific mental-health referrals. These liaisons acted as trusted messengers who provided stabilization during periods of heightened fear.
Source: Reporting summarized in Oregon Public Broadcasting education coverage (2024).


National Practices (2025): Trauma-Informed School Models Identified by NCTSN

The National Child Traumatic Stress Network highlights school practices that mitigate trauma for immigrant and refugee students, including staff training on secondary trauma, culturally grounded counseling approaches, and creation of calming spaces within school buildings. These strategies are increasingly adopted in districts experiencing heightened enforcement activity.
Source: https://www.nctsn.org/what-is-child-trauma/trauma-informed-care/trauma-informed-schools

Community Support Resources

Confederation of Somali Community in Minnesota (CSCMN)

Community-based support, navigation, culturally grounded youth programming.
https://csc-mn.org

CAIR-Minnesota

Crisis response, Islamophobia support, advocacy, and culturally aligned referral networks.

https://cairmn.org/

Minnesota Care Counseling Services, Inc.

Mental-health services for East African immigrant and refugee communities.
https://mncarecounseling.com

Center for Victims of Torture (CVT – St. Paul)

Trauma-informed mental-health services for survivors of torture and refugee trauma.
https://www.cvt.org

Statewide Systems & Public-Health Partners 

Minnesota Department of Health — Refugee Health Program

Newcomer and refugee health screening guidance—including mental-health screening, RHS-15 tools, and directories of culturally specific providers.
https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/rih

Minnesota Department of Human Services — Culturally Specific Behavioral Health Services (CEMIG)

State-funded behavioral health and substance-use services tailored to culturally specific communities.
https://mn.gov/dhs/partners-and-providers/policies-procedures/behavioral-health/cemig

Minnesota DHS — Refugee Resettlement Programs Office

Resettlement coordination, mental-health referrals, case management, and support pathways for newcomer families.
https://mn.gov/dhs/people-we-serve/children-and-families/services/refugee-programs

Newcomer Mental-Health & Trauma-Informed Education Resources

National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) — Trauma-Informed Schools

Guidance for trauma-responsive school practices, including resources for refugee and immigrant youth.
https://www.nctsn.org

Education Northwest — Supporting Newcomer Immigrant Youth (2024 Brief)

Evidence-based practices for trauma-informed and culturally responsive school supports.
https://educationnorthwest.org/sites/default/files/pdf/newcomer-trauma-brief-508c.pdf

Trauma-Informed, Resilience-Oriented Schools Toolkit

Comprehensive framework for implementing trauma-responsive systems in schools.
https://www.nc2s.org/resource/trauma-informed-resilience-oriented-schools-toolkit/

Legal & Rights-Based Partners 

The Advocates for Human Rights

Legal support, human-rights education, and trauma-informed referrals.
https://www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org

Immigrant Law Center of Minnesota (ILCM)

Immigration legal assistance and family support that intersects with trauma and enforcement-related fear.
https://www.ilcm.org

Strategy 4: Strengthen Data Privacy

Why This Matters in Minnesota

During immigration-enforcement threats, even routine data practices can expose families to harm. 

Minnesota districts hold significant legal authority under federal privacy law (FERPA), state data practices statutes, and civil-rights protections. Schools are not obligated to share student information with immigration enforcement, and in most cases are prohibited from doing so. Protecting data is therefore not only a legal responsibility—it is an equity imperative essential to maintaining safety, belonging, and access to education.

1. Protect Student Data and Limit Collection

  • Limit collecting sensitive information (place of birth, citizenship, immigration status) unless legally required.
  • Restrict access to student records to staff with a legitimate educational need.
  • Default families to directory-information opt-out unless they choose otherwise.

2. Assert Legal Authority and Establish Clear Protocols

  • Require that all law-enforcement requests, including ICE and DHS, be directed immediately to district legal counsel.
  • Document every request for student information and reject requests that do not meet FERPA, state law, or district policy.
  • Maintain clear, districtwide procedures for responding to immigration-enforcement contact.

3. Train All Staff to Respond Safely and Legally

Training must include:

  • Front-office staff, administrators, teachers, counselors, social workers, transportation staff, custodial teams, and after-school personnel
    Training must cover:
  • FERPA and student-privacy protections
  • How to respond if immigration agents appear at or near campus
  • District non-cooperation policies
  • What not to do (no identity verification, no roster sharing, no unauthorized access)

4. Communicate Clearly With Families

Provide multilingual information that explains:

  • What data schools do not collect
  • How student information is protected
  • How to opt out of directory-information sharing
  • That schools are legally protected spaces where immigration enforcement is limited

Across the country, districts are clarifying and strengthening data-privacy practices to protect immigrant students’ rights, safety, and dignity. These examples show how schools assert legal authority, reassure families, and prevent exploitation of student and family information.

Denver Public Schools: Asserting FERPA Protections Against Federal Data Requests

Denver Public Schools publicly reaffirmed their refusal to share student information—including immigration-related data—with federal immigration enforcement agencies, citing FERPA protections and district policy. The district issued guidance to families clarifying what information is protected and established legal-review protocols for all external requests.
Associated Press: https://apnews.com/article/d3baeee5db9525ff56b7bc8f5c81117f

California School Districts: Requiring Notification When Immigration Agents Seek Campus Access

Following heightened enforcement, California districts adopted policies requiring immediate notification to superintendents and legal counsel if immigration agents come to a school. They also trained staff in non-cooperation procedures and created multilingual family notices explaining these protections.
The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/california-immigration-enforcement-schools-families

National Civil-Rights Guidance: Data Privacy as a Core Equity Obligation

National civil-rights organizations emphasize that schools must limit information sharing, prohibit discrimination based on perceived immigration status, and act affirmatively to ensure immigrant students feel safe accessing education.
American Immigration Council: https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/immigration-and-schools

National (Migration Policy Institute, 2025): Updated Enrollment Guidance to Protect Access

Migration Policy Institute analysis showed districts updating enrollment procedures to ensure they do not request immigration-related documents and clearly communicate that all students have the right to attend school regardless of status.
Source: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/news/schools-immigrant-students-enforcement

Strategy 5: Ensure Safe Transportation During Heightened Threats & Enforcement Fears

Why this Matters in Minnesota

When Somali, Latino, and other immigrant communities experience heightened threats—from targeted rhetoric, surveillance concerns, or rumored enforcement activity—families may avoid driving, walking, or appearing in public. These fears, even without direct ICE presence, create real barriers to students accessing school.

Ensuring students can safely and reliably get to school is a critical part of Minnesota’s constitutional promise of an accessible education and is essential to sustaining the belonging, stability, and well-being of every Minnesota learner.

1. Adapt District Transportation for Student & Family Safety

  • Review and revise bus routes to reduce exposure to high-visibility or high-risk areas during periods of heightened threats or surveillance concerns.
  • Add temporary safe pickup points at trusted community sites (mosques, cultural centers, libraries, designated school facilities) to reduce walking distances and increase safety.
  • Offer flexible pick-up and drop-off options, including discreet meeting points, adjusted schedules, and short-term shuttle loops from trusted hubs.

2. Ensure Drivers are Trained  on District Non-Cooperation Policies

Make sure drivers understand:

  • Schools do not collect or share immigration status.
  • Drivers should not speak to or provide information to immigration agents.
  • Only designated administrators may respond to law enforcement requests.

Drivers should know:

  • How to secure the bus during ICE threats
  • How to maintain student privacy (no verification of identity, no sharing rosters)
  • How to contact administrators immediately
  • Where to pull over safely and legally

3. Develop School-Community Safe Passage Systems

  • Coordinate “walking school buses.”
    Partner with educators, families, and community organizations to organize adult-guided walking groups for safe travel during high-fear periods.
  • Establish trusted-adult accompaniment programs. Develop systems where vetted adults—school staff, family volunteers, youth workers—walk or travel with students along designated routes.

  • Deploy staff or community navigators on key routes. Activate short-term “escort routes” staffed by trained navigators to create a visible, trusted presence between neighborhoods and school sites.
  • Designate safe community hubs.
    Work with cultural organizations, community centers, and school sites to create trusted places where families can gather, coordinate travel, share reliable information, and receive immediate guidance.

3. Provide Clear, Multilingual Transportation Communication

  • Send real-time transportation updates via WhatsApp, SMS, Somali-language media, community radio, and school apps.
  • Communicate clearly and consistently that:
    • Schools do not cooperate with immigration enforcement
    • Student information and privacy are fully protected
    • Safe-route and transportation supports are available to ensure every student can continue attending school safely.

Schools nationally are addressing mobility and attendance barriers during enforcement fears by building community-based safety supports and transportation adaptations. These examples illustrate actionable practices for Minnesota districts.


California (AFT, 2024–2025): Walking School Buses for Safe Travel

Reporting from the American Federation of Teachers documented districts organizing adult-led walking school buses to help students travel safely when families feared driving or walking alone. Educators and community members increased their presence and accompanied students along common routes, helping reduce fear-driven absences.
Source: aft.org/news/back-school-joy-tempered-fear


Chicago (Chalkbeat, 2025): Teacher-Led Safe-Pathway Networks

Chalkbeat Chicago reported that, during intensified enforcement activity, teachers helped create escort networks, staffed walking routes, and set up community meeting points to support students who were afraid to travel to school. These networks helped maintain attendance and reduce isolation.
Source: chalkbeat.org/chicago/2025/11/24/teachers-help-calm-student-immigration-fears-amid-ice-raids


National (EdWeek Research Center, 2025): Adjusting Transportation to Overcome Fear-Based Barriers

A national EdWeek analysis found that students frequently avoided buses or walking routes during periods of enforcement fear. Districts responded by adjusting pickup points, offering flexible arrival alternatives, and training transportation staff in rights-based, non-cooperation protocols to reduce anxiety and absenteeism.
Source: edweek.org/leadership/the-widespread-effects-of-immigration-enforcement-on-schools-in-charts/2025/11


Texas (IDRA, 2024–2025): Trusted Pickup and Drop-Off Locations

IDRA’s reporting highlighted districts that partnered with community organizations to create trusted pickup sites—including mosques, churches, and cultural centers—so families could avoid direct trips to school during fear periods.
Source: idra.org/education_policy/how-schools-should-support-children-impacted-by-ice-raids/


Oregon (OPB, 2024): Community Liaisons Supporting Travel Safety

Oregon Public Broadcasting reported that districts deployed community liaisons to check in with families, offer safety information, and serve as trusted adults helping students navigate daily travel during enforcement-related fear.

Strategy 6: Communicate Clearly to Uphold Student Rights & the Public Mission of Schools

Why This Matters in Minnesota 

Targeted enforcement—paired with racist rhetoric designed to dehumanize Somali, Latino, and immigrant Minnesotans and cast them outside the protection of public life—does more than create fear. It works to weaken the legal and civic foundations that guide Minnesota’s schools and define their public purpose. In this moment, clear, rights-aligned communication is not only a moral obligation but a legal safeguard. It protects educators from discriminatory pressure, reinforces the district’s lawful authority, and affirms every student’s dignity, safety, and belonging.

These harmful narratives and rhetoric operate with intent. They are designed to:

  • Erode trust in public institutions, beginning with the schools families rely on most.
  • Redefine who is seen as belonging in public life.
  • Shift Minnesota away from a shared civic foundation and toward fear-based governance.
  • Silence schools, allowing exclusionary actors to shape public understanding and community response.

Neutrality in this moment does not create safety—it cedes power. It allows harmful, racialized narratives to drive public fear, distort decision-making, and destabilize the conditions students need to thrive.

Schools must communicate from shared purpose, legal obligation, and community trust. As public institutions, they have a constitutional and civic duty to affirm the dignity and rights of every student, uphold data-privacy and nondiscrimination protections, and make clear that Minnesota’s schools will not participate in—or legitimize—discriminatory enforcement.

Targeted enforcement and harmful rhetoric designed to dehumanize Somali, Latino, and immigrant Minnesotans do more than create fear. Thety erode the legal and civic foundations that guide Minnesota’s public schools. When harmful narratives spread unchecked, they undermine trust, distort public understanding, and create pressure on educators to comply with discriminatory or unlawful demands.

Clear, rights-aligned communication is a safeguard against these harms. It protects students, affirms belonging, and reinforces the district’s legal and constitutional obligations to honor the rights and dignity of every learner, regardless of immigration status. It also protects educators by grounding decisions in law—not political pressures—and by making visible the public mission schools serve in Minnesota’s multiracial democracy.

Strong, consistent communication ensures families receive accurate information, remain connected to school, and know that their children’s safety, dignity, and learning are protected.

1. Center the rights and dignity of every learner.

Communicate clearly that all students—regardless of immigration status—are protected by district policy, civil-rights law, and constitutional guarantees to safety, privacy, and education.

This reinforces that every learner is entitled to protection and belonging and counters narratives that attempt to exclude or dehumanize Somali, Latino, Black, Muslim, immigrant, or multilingual students.

2. Position schools as essential civic institutions with a public mission.

Emphasize that public schools are democratic institutions responsible for protecting rights, fostering belonging, and ensuring equitable access to education for all students.

This pushes back against efforts to undermine the public purpose of schools or pressure educators into treating student rights as optional or negotiable.

3. Communicate from legal mandate—not discretion.

Ground communications in the district’s constitutional, statutory, and civil-rights obligations.

Clear statements of law protect educators from pressure to comply with discriminatory demands and reinforce the district’s authority to safeguard student rights and privacy.

4. Name harm clearly and directly.

Acknowledge the fear, trauma, and disruption that targeted enforcement and racialized rhetoric create for students and families.

This grounds communication in real community experience, prevents harmful actors from defining the moment, and strengthens trust with those most affected.

5. Reaffirm belonging as a core component of school safety.

Define safety to include emotional, cultural, and civic well-being—being recognized, valued, and affirmed as part of the school community.

This reframes belonging as a foundational safety responsibility and counters narratives that seek to isolate or stigmatize immigrant and multilingual students.

6. Communicate stability, continuity, and care.

Provide steady, multilingual updates focused on rights, support systems, and continuity of learning during periods of community fear or uncertainty.

This counters disinformation, reduces panic, and reinforces that schools remain a consistent and reliable presence for students and families.

7. Speak in the language of solidarity—not surveillance or suspicion.

Communicate with families; not about them. Use communication that conveys shared purpose, collective care, and share responsibility for well-being—not bureaucratic language that feels extractive, punitive, or detached.

This strengthens relational trust and disrupts narratives that criminalize or pathologize immigrant families.

8. Center community-defined values and trusted messengers.

Collaborate with Somali-led, immigrant-serving, and multilingual partners to shape messages and distribute them through the channels families rely on most—WhatsApp, SMS, community announcements, Somali radio and TV.

This strengthens cultural accuracy, builds trust, and ensures critical information reaches those most affected by enforcement-related fear.

1. Issue a districtwide statement.

Affirm student rights, belonging, privacy protections, and the legal limits of immigration enforcement in schools.

2. Translate and distribute communication through trusted channels.

Provide information in Somali, English, Arabic, Spanish, Hmong, Karen, and other languages families use. Share through preferred and safe method of communication, including WhatsApp groups, cultural centers, and multilingual media.

3. Develop a rapid-response communication protocol.
Outline clear steps, roles, and messaging to activate during moments of heightened threats or targeting.

4. Train all leaders and staff in essential messaging.

Ensure school leaders, educators, support staff, office staff, liaisons, counselors, and security personnel understand privacy laws, nondiscrimination obligations, and how to respond to fear or misinformation in ways that uphold your school’s mission, values, and legal responsibilities.

5. Communicate proactively and regularly.

Communication shouldn’t begin when harm occurs. District and school updates should routinely affirm safety, stability, and student rights, and remind families of the protections and protocols that are in place for every learner.

6. Avoid fear-based messaging; prioritize rights, accuracy, and belonging.

Provide clear, grounded, factual information—not speculation. Use specifics and language that reassures rather than escalates fear.

7. Partner with Somali-led and other immigrant-serving organizations.

Co-create messages, vet translations, and ensure communication reflects community expertise and cultural knowledge.

8. Align communication with broader district equity goals.

Integrate communication protocols into equity plans, student-support systems, and district governance structures.

Ongoing Strategies for Centering Student Safety & Belonging

Tools, Resources, and Partners in Building Safe, Supportive Schools

Recognizing and Addressing Implicit Bias

Conduct regular staff training on implicit bias, cultural responsiveness, and the role of systemic inequities in shaping student experiences.

Facilitate workshops to explore how educators’ assumptions and expectations can impact EL students’ academic and social success.

Building Equity-Centered School Policies and Practices

Implement equity audits to identify and understand areas where school policies and practices may disadvantage immigrant and EL students.

Partner with equity organizations to conduct equity audits, review policies, and develop frameworks and action plans to address systemic inequities and create classrooms that enhance EL and immigrant student experiences and outcomes.

Creating Safe, Supportive, & Culturally Validating Education Spaces

Facilitate staff and student training on Culturally Validating Pedagogy (CVP/L) and student belonging.

Build district-wide protocols and standards that celebrate and honor students’ diverse cultural and linguistic identities in the classroom environment and curriculum.

Tools: Professional development opportunities and training in race equity frameworks and CVP/L through MnEEP’s Race Equity Training Center.

Strengthening Trust & Relationships with Families

Host “Know Your Rights” workshops and provide multilingual resources to families.

Inform families about their rights under laws like FERPA and local privacy regulations.

Tools: Community partner directories, parent/caregiver-focused handouts, and planning templates for responding to ICE detainments or deportations.

Supporting Students’ Emotional & Mental Health

Current rhetoric and fear of deportation and family separation can have a profound impact on the emotional health and wellbeing of immigrant and EL students. 

School supports and resources should be culturally validating,  culturally relevant, and honor the unique experiences and assets of immigrant and EL students.

Mental Health Supports for Students

Connect students with counselors, psychologists, and culturally affirming services.

Classroom Strategies for Trauma-Informed Teaching

Build safety, trust, and routines that help students process emotions and focus on learning.

Culturally Validating Classrooms Supports

Incorporate culturally validating practices to honor students’ experiences cultural and linguistic identities. 

Partnerships & Community Resources/Directory

A directory of trusted local, regional, and national immigration partners and resources to ensure families and students receive the critical supports they need right now.

Immigration Legal Guidance

Metro

Southern Minnesota

Immigration Rights Attoneys

Resources for families 

  • Abigail Wahl, Puerta Grande Law
  • Iris Ramos, The Law Offices of Iris Ramos, LLC
  • Jesus Torres, Torres Garza Law
  • Graham Ojala Barbour, Ojala Barbour Law Firm, PLLC
  • Susana De Leon & Bruce Nestor, De Leon and Nestor, LLC

Know Your Rights Resources

ILRC Know-Your-Rights Cards:

  • Printable cards in multiple languages to help students and families understand their rights.

Immigrant Defense Project Know-Your-Rights Resources:

  • Offers detailed resources for responding to ICE encounters.

ACLU Know-Your-Rights Guide for Immigrants:

  • Practical resources for immigrant families, available in multiple languages.

Emergency Planning Tools

ILRC Step-by-Step Family Preparedness Plan:

  • Templates and tools for families to prepare for potential deportation-related disruptions.

AFT: Protecting Our Students: Deportation Defense Toolkit 

Spanish-Language Version

  • Steps for preparing families amid threats of ICE raids

Kids in Need of Defense (KIND):

  • Emergency planning resources and guidance for immigrant families.

Culturally Validating Tools & Resources

Video: How Language Justice Drives Educational Excellence for Minnesota Students

  • The critical role of language justice in fostering equitable and culturally validating learning environments that empower all students to succeed.

MnEEP Race Equity Glossary

  • Clear definitions and insights into key equity terms, helping educators and leaders ground their work in culturally responsive and validating practices.

MnEEP Tools, Resources, and Trainings for Creating Equitable and Inclusive Learning Environments 

  • Utilize tools, resources, and trainings to address systemic inequities, celebrate students’ unique cultural and linguistic identities, and enhance academic outcomes for immigrant and EL students.

Mental Health & Trauma-Informed Supports

School-based Mental Health Programs

Colorín Colorado – Immigrant Students & Trauma-Informed Supports

  • Strategies for recognizing and addressing student anxiety and trauma, as well as to understand traumatic experiences immigrant students might have endured.

Chicano Latinos Unidos En Servicio (CLUES)

  • Receive culturally responsive, professional support to help you or your family overcome emotional challenges at Abriendo Caminos Wellness and Prevention Center.

Minnesota Cultural Resource List

  • A list of statewide support services and mental health resources for immigrant and refugee families and their children.

National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN):

Resources for schools to address trauma and support immigrant students.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA):

  • Guidance on implementing trauma-informed care in schools.

Authorship & Acknowledgment
Grounded in real-world needs, the Safe and Supportive Schools Toolkit was researched, written, and created by Molly Priesmeyer, MnEEP Director of Communications and Narrative, drawing on the knowledge, insights, gaps, and priorities identified by educators and school leaders across Minnesota and immigration attorneys and immigrations rights leaders from organizations such as Justica Law, Unidos MN, and leading national organizations building power for immigrant rights.

Back To Top